Skip to content

Topic hub · 20 articles

IQ Tests and Reasoning

Almost everything written about IQ online is either a sales pitch for a quiz or an argument about politics. Neither tells you the thing worth knowing: an IQ score is a rank, not a quantity. It describes where one person sat relative to a comparison group on one day, on one set of tasks, and it carries a margin of error wide enough to matter.

That single idea does most of the work in this subject. It explains why two tests disagree, why a score moves between sittings, why "genius-level" thresholds are marketing, and why a free online quiz cannot produce the number a supervised assessment produces — no matter how similar the questions look.

These articles cover the reasoning tasks themselves, the statistics that turn answers into a score, and the limits of the whole exercise. They are written to be useful to someone deciding whether a result means anything, and honest about the fact that most of the time the answer is "less than the number implies".

Where to start

  • Start with what the score is

    Read the cornerstone guide first. Standardisation, norming and the standard error of measurement come up in every other article here, and none of them make sense in isolation.

  • Then the task types

    Matrix reasoning, series completion, analogies and spatial rotation each have their own logic. Knowing how an item is built is the difference between pattern-matching and understanding.

  • Keep practice and assessment apart

    Practising a task type improves performance on that task type. That is a real, useful effect, and it is not the same as a change in underlying ability — an important distinction the practice-focused hubs return to repeatedly.

Start here

Everything else in this hub