Skip to content

What Was Happening in China, Africa and the Americas While Rome Ruled

A genuine slice through the first five centuries CE: Han China, Teotihuacan, Aksum, the Nasca lines and Buddhist monastic South Asia, all at once.

By Published 5 min read

Reign Creative LLC makes World History Timeline Sim, which this article links to, so we have a commercial interest in it. How we write and check articles.

Key takeaways

  • The first five centuries CE were crowded everywhere: a synchronic slice through them turns up major states and monumental building on at least four continents.
  • The overland routes linking Chang'an and Luoyang to Central Asia took shape between the second century BC and the first century AD, according to UNESCO, and stayed in use until the sixteenth century.
  • Teotihuacan, in the Basin of Mexico, was built between the first and seventh centuries AD and is described by UNESCO as one of the most powerful cultural centres in Mesoamerica.
  • Aksum, in what is now northern Ethiopia, is described by UNESCO as the most powerful state between the Eastern Roman Empire and Persia, with ruins spanning the first to the thirteenth centuries AD.
  • Reading one century across regions instead of down a single national story is a different exercise, and it is the one a region filter on a chronology tool is actually good for.

While Rome dominated the Mediterranean, the Han dynasty held the central capitals of China and the overland routes running west from them, a city of monumental pyramids was rising in the Basin of Mexico, a kingdom on the Red Sea was minting its own power between the Roman and Persian worlds, geoglyphs were being cut into the Peruvian coastal plain, and Buddhist monasteries were being built into hillsides in the north-west of the Indian subcontinent. None of these were reacting to Rome. They were the other things that were happening.

Setting the window

This article slices horizontally rather than vertically. Instead of following one state from beginning to end, it takes roughly the first five centuries CE and asks what was going on across the map at the same time.

That is a different exercise from the usual one, and it produces a different picture. Rome is a reasonable anchor because most readers already have its outline, and because the arguments about its trajectory — surveyed in why Rome fell — are the familiar reference points. But it is an anchor, not the subject.

China: two capitals and the roads west

For much of this window the Han dynasty governed from Chang'an and Luoyang. UNESCO's World Heritage inscription for the Silk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang'an-Tianshan Corridor describes a 5,000 km section running from Chang'an and Luoyang, the central capitals of China under the Han and Tang dynasties, to the Zhetysu region of Central Asia. The inscription states that the network took shape between the second century BC and the first century AD and remained in use until the sixteenth century, linking multiple civilisations and carrying trade, religious belief, scientific knowledge, technological innovation, cultural practice and art.

Its thirty-three listed components give a sense of what such a network physically consisted of: capital cities and palace complexes of various empires and khanates, trading settlements, Buddhist cave temples, ancient paths, posthouses, passes, beacon towers, sections of the Great Wall, fortifications, tombs and religious buildings.

The Han did not last the whole window. China divided into competing states after it, and the political map of the third to sixth centuries is as complicated as the contemporaneous Mediterranean one. Our introduction to the Silk Road covers who actually moved goods along these routes and why the modern name is younger than the thing it names.

Mesoamerica: Teotihuacan

About 50 km north-east of present-day Mexico City, UNESCO describes the city of Teotihuacan as built between the first and seventh centuries AD, characterised by the vast size of its monuments — in particular the Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the Pyramids of the Sun and the Moon — laid out on geometric and symbolic principles. It calls the city one of the most powerful cultural centres in Mesoamerica, one that extended its cultural and artistic influence throughout the region and beyond.

The chronology is worth sitting with. A planned monumental city was under construction in the Basin of Mexico across the same centuries in which Roman power peaked and then reorganised, with no contact between the two and no awareness on either side. Pre-Columbian studies is a substantial research field in its own right — Dumbarton Oaks has run a dedicated programme in it alongside its Byzantine one for decades — and treating it as a parallel subject rather than an appendix is the point of an exercise like this.

The Horn of Africa: Aksum

UNESCO's inscription for Aksum, near Ethiopia's northern border, describes massive ruins dating from between the first and the thirteenth century AD: monolithic obelisks, giant stelae, royal tombs and the remains of ancient castles. It identifies the site as the heart of ancient Ethiopia, when the Kingdom of Aksum was the most powerful state between the Eastern Roman Empire and Persia — and notes that long after its political decline in the tenth century, Ethiopian emperors continued to be crowned there.

That phrasing does something useful. It positions Aksum by its own weight, as one of three major powers in a connected zone, rather than as a periphery of either of the others.

The Andes: lines on the coastal plain

In the arid Peruvian coastal plain some 400 km south of Lima, the geoglyphs of Nasca and the pampas of Jumana cover about 450 square kilometres. UNESCO dates the lines to between 500 BC and AD 500 and describes them as depicting living creatures, stylised plants and imaginary beings, alongside geometric figures several kilometres long.

Note how the same source handles interpretation: the geoglyphs are described as being believed to have had ritual astronomical functions. That hedge is doing real work, and it should survive being quoted. The dating and the physical description are one kind of claim; the purpose is another, and much less settled.

South Asia: monasteries built into the hills

UNESCO's inscription for the Buddhist Ruins of Takht-i-Bahi, in present-day Pakistan, records a monastic complex founded in the early first century, exceptionally well preserved because of its position on the crest of a high hill, with the ruins of a small fortified city, Sahr-i-Bahlol, nearby and dating from the same period.

Monastic architecture at that scale implies patronage, surplus and durable institutions. It is the same kind of evidence as a Roman aqueduct or a Mesoamerican pyramid — a society investing in permanent stone for something it expected to last.

Reading a century sideways

The habit this article is really recommending is running a fixed date range across every region rather than down one.

World History Timeline Sim, which is our own app built by Reign Creative, supports this directly: set a year range, then switch the region filter and watch what changes. Doing that for the first to fifth centuries produces the list above without anyone having to tell you it exists. It is a tool for exploration and orientation, and it is not a substitute for textbooks, peer-reviewed scholarship or primary sources — the UNESCO inscriptions cited here are free, brief, and a better place to check any specific claim.

For the period vocabulary underneath all of this, the major eras of world history covers what "classical" is asserting and where it stops applying. How to actually learn something from a timeline app covers turning browsing into checking. More is collected in the world history timelines hub, and our other learning tools sit under education and brain games.

Good to know

Frequently asked questions

What was China's situation during the Roman Empire?
For much of the period the Han dynasty held the central capitals at Chang'an and Luoyang, and the overland routes running west from them were already established — UNESCO dates the formation of that network to between the second century BC and the first century AD. After the Han, China divided into competing states before later reunification, so "during the Roman Empire" covers both a unified empire and a long period of division.
Were there cities in the Americas at the same time as Rome?
Yes. Teotihuacan, north-east of present-day Mexico City, was built between the first and seventh centuries AD, with the Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the Pyramids of the Sun and the Moon laid out on geometric and symbolic principles. UNESCO describes it as one of the most powerful cultural centres in Mesoamerica, extending its cultural and artistic influence across the region and beyond.
Did these regions know about each other?
Partly, and unevenly. Eurasia and the Red Sea world were connected by overland and maritime routes carrying goods, people and ideas, so Rome, Iran, India, Aksum and Han China sat in one loosely linked system. The Americas were not part of that system. Contemporaneity and contact are separate questions, and a timeline shows the first without implying the second.
Why is this period taught as if only Rome existed?
Because most European and North American curricula inherited a Mediterranean-centred syllabus, and because Latin and Greek written sources are unusually abundant and were studied continuously. The result is a familiar story for one region and a blank map for the rest of the same centuries, which comparative reading corrects quickly.

Sources

  1. Silk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang'an-Tianshan Corridor (opens in a new tab)UNESCO World Heritage Centre — accessed
  2. Pre-Hispanic City of Teotihuacan (opens in a new tab)UNESCO World Heritage Centre — accessed
  3. Aksum (opens in a new tab)UNESCO World Heritage Centre — accessed
  4. Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa (opens in a new tab)UNESCO World Heritage Centre — accessed
  5. Buddhist Ruins of Takht-i-Bahi and Neighbouring City Remains at Sahr-i-Bahlol (opens in a new tab)UNESCO World Heritage Centre — accessed
  6. Pre-Columbian Studies (opens in a new tab)Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection — accessed

About the author

— The independent app studio that builds the apps covered on this site and publishes every article here. On Google Play it publishes as Reign Collective Apps.

We use AI tools to help research, draft and edit our articles. Each article lists the sources its factual claims rely on, and details about our apps come from their live Google Play listings. No article on this site has been reviewed by an independent expert unless the reviewer is named on it.

Spotted an error? Tell us — how corrections are handled is set out in our editorial policy.