Key takeaways
- Wikipedia defines the Renaissance as a European period and cultural movement, variously dated to the 15th and 16th centuries or, more broadly, from the 14th century to the 17th.
- It was first centred in the Republic of Florence, then spread to the rest of Italy and later throughout Europe.
- Giorgio Vasari used the word rinascita (rebirth) in his Lives of the Artists of 1550; Jules Michelet defined 'the Renaissance' as a whole historical period in 1855.
- Proposed causes for the Florentine start include Medici patronage, the city's civic structure, the Black Death and Greek scholars arriving in Italy; Wikipedia says why it began in Italy remains much debated.
- The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy notes that the word 'humanism' for the new scholarship came only in the nineteenth century, and that Pico's famous 1486 theses were thoroughly medieval in content.
The Renaissance was a European cultural movement — and, by extension, a period — marked by the rediscovery and revival of the literary, philosophical and artistic achievements of classical antiquity. Wikipedia describes it as first centred in the Republic of Florence, spreading to the rest of Italy and later throughout Europe. Almost everything else about it, from its dates to its name to whether it was really new, is argued over, and that argument is worth understanding before memorising any list of painters.
Three answers to "when"
Wikipedia gives two standard definitions: the 15th and 16th centuries, or more broadly the 14th century to the 17th. One source it cites dates the period 1350 to 1620. In Italy the end is conventionally placed at the waning of humanism, with one of three markers: the Reformation (1517), the Sack of Rome (1527) or the Counter-Reformation (1545).
Those choices give very different lengths:
| Definition | Span | Length |
|---|---|---|
| 15th and 16th centuries | 1401–1600 | 200 years |
| 1350 to 1620 | 1350–1620 | 270 years |
| 14th to 17th centuries | 1301–1700 | 400 years |
The broadest version is twice as long as the narrowest. Some writers even fix a precise start: Wikipedia mentions 1401, when Lorenzo Ghiberti and Filippo Brunelleschi competed to make the bronze doors of the Florence Baptistery (Ghiberti won). Others trace first signs to the late thirteenth century, in the writings of Dante (1265–1321) and the paintings of Giotto (1267–1337). Why historians draw these lines differently is the subject of periodisation in history.
Why Florence, and why then
Wikipedia is frank that it "remains much debated" why the movement began in Italy and when it did. The candidate explanations it lists are:
- Patronage. The Medici, a banking family and later a ducal house, sponsored artists; Lorenzo de' Medici (1449–1492) encouraged commissions from Leonardo da Vinci, Botticelli and Michelangelo. Wikipedia adds that the Renaissance was under way before the Medici achieved dominance, so patronage cannot be the whole story.
- City-states and commerce. Italy was divided among Naples, Florence, Rome, Milan, Genoa, Venice and smaller states, and fifteenth-century Italy was one of the most urbanised parts of Europe. Florence was a textile capital and Venice a gateway to Eastern trade, which paid for large commissions.
- Plague. Florence's population was nearly halved in 1348. One theory holds that familiarity with death turned thinkers toward earthly life; another, that it prompted a wave of piety and religious art. Wikipedia notes the Black Death hit all of Europe, so it does not explain why Italy specifically. More on the pandemic is in the Black Death explained.
- Greek scholars and texts. Wikipedia dates the return of Greek literary study in the West to Coluccio Salutati's 1396 invitation to the Byzantine scholar Manuel Chrysoloras to teach Greek in Florence, and describes a further wave of émigré scholars after the fall of Constantinople in 1453. That inheritance is traced in Byzantium's thousand years.
Its own conclusion is that the Italian emergence was most likely the result of a complex interaction of these factors.
Latin first, then Greek
Wikipedia separates Renaissance humanism into two phases. In a fourteenth-century Latin phase, Petrarch, Salutati, Niccolò de' Niccoli and Poggio Bracciolini searched Europe's libraries for works by Cicero, Lucretius, Livy and Seneca; by the early fifteenth century most surviving Latin literature had been recovered. A Greek phase followed, bringing back Homer, the dramatists, Demosthenes and Thucydides — literary and historical works that, Wikipedia says, had been studied in the Middle Ages only by Byzantine scholars.
That is a different emphasis from earlier medieval revivals. Greek and Arabic works of science and philosophy had already reached Latin Europe through translation centres such as the Toledo School of Translators between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries — a transmission Wikipedia calls one of the greatest in history. The scholars behind those texts are covered in scholars of the Islamic Golden Age.
A famous speech that its author never named
Giovanni Pico della Mirandola is often presented as the voice of the Renaissance, and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a useful corrective. Pico had 900 propositions printed in Rome at the end of 1486 for a debate he planned for 1487. The speech written to introduce them was never delivered or published in his lifetime; others later called it the Oration on the Dignity of Man, a title Pico never gave it. Pope Innocent VIII indicted 13 of the theses, and the Holy See blocked the conference.
The encyclopedia adds two points that complicate the textbook picture. The new philological way of reading ancient languages only came to be called "humanism" in the nineteenth century. And the content of Pico's 900 theses was, in its words, "thoroughly medieval". The label and the substance do not line up neatly.
Vasari's rebirth and Michelet's period
The name has its own history. Wikipedia records that Giorgio Vasari used rinascita (rebirth) in his Lives of the Artists of 1550, revised 1568, describing a recovery of the arts beginning with Cimabue and Giotto after what he saw as Gothic decline. The French word Renaissance was popularised by Jules Michelet, whose Histoire de France in 1855 used it for an entire historical period — 305 years after Vasari. Jacob Burckhardt's The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy (1860) then defined it as the era from Giotto to Michelangelo and saw in it the emergence of modern individuality.
Not everyone agreed. Wikipedia notes that Johan Huizinga questioned whether the change was positive, and that many historians today stress continuity with the Middle Ages, linked, as Panofsky observed, "by a thousand ties".
North of the Alps
The movement did not simply copy Italy as it spread. Wikipedia describes the "Northern Renaissance" developing alongside printing in Germany and the Low Countries around 1450, with artists such as Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528), and notes that Jan van Eyck and his brother perfected oil painting there. Influence also ran south: the Burgundian School and Netherlandish polyphony shaped Italian music. In France, Charles VIII brought Italian ideas back after his 1495 invasion. For how print carried these ideas, see the printing press and its impact; for the religious upheaval that followed, the Protestant Reformation.
Following the thread in the app
World History Timeline Sim, our own app, lets you browse major events by year, era, region or category, which suits a movement whose start and end shift depending on where you stand. Anything you try in Time Travel Mode is a what-if: the listing says its chains of consequences are simulations, not what happened. The Google Play listing describes the app as a companion to coursework, not a replacement for it — something to open next to Vasari or Burckhardt, not instead of them. Downloading is free, with ads and optional in-app purchases; related titles are in education and brain apps.
Good to know
Frequently asked questions
What years did the Renaissance cover?
Why did the Renaissance start in Florence?
Who first called the period the Renaissance?
Was the Renaissance a clean break from the Middle Ages?
Sources
- Renaissance (opens in a new tab)Wikipedia — accessed
- Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (opens in a new tab)Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — accessed
About the author
Reign Creative LLC — The independent app studio that builds the apps covered on this site and publishes every article here. On Google Play it publishes as Reign Collective Apps.
We use AI tools to help research, draft and edit our articles. Each article lists the sources its factual claims rely on, and details about our apps come from their live Google Play listings. No article on this site has been reviewed by an independent expert unless the reviewer is named on it.
No person at Reign Creative LLC has read this article in full. It was published after automated checks and an AI editorial review, which are described in our editorial policy and are not the same as a person reading every sentence.
Spotted an error? Tell us — how corrections are handled is set out in our editorial policy.